Bettum, By Johan. AN INTERVIEW WITH SANFORD KWINTER
(n.d.): n. pag. Web.
This was a short interview conducted by Johnan Bettum with Sanford Kwinter. In the interview there are several topics discussed. Firstly the interview was directly related to the first phase of the project "the space of communication" the purpose of the project being, somewhat self explanatory, is an exploration of the space of communication. In the interview they discuss the changing world of communication and calling life a social app. It is an interesting interview and plainly shows Sanford Kwinters beliefs and ideology.
"Buckminster Fuller: Thinking Out Loud." Youtube. Zeitgeist Films, 1996. Web. 1 Oct. 2015.
This video was published in 1996 after the passing of Buckminster Fuller. It was a biography of his life showing the evolution of his "theisis" The start with the strength of the triangular structure and the progression in to the dimoxian car and home which were both objects that were created with lightweight materials and primarily used tension. Both of these projects failed however and only prototypes exist today. The geodesic dome was arguably the most successful of Fullers innovations and based of the principals of tensegrity. The film also dug into the mans philosophy.
Calatrava, Santiago, Cecilia Lewis Kausel, and Ann Pendleton-Julian. Santiago Calatrava, Conversations with Students: The M.I.T. Lectures. New York: Princeton Architectural, 2002. Print.
This was a short interview conducted by Johnan Bettum with Sanford Kwinter. In the interview there are several topics discussed. Firstly the interview was directly related to the first phase of the project "the space of communication" the purpose of the project being, somewhat self explanatory, is an exploration of the space of communication. In the interview they discuss the changing world of communication and calling life a social app. It is an interesting interview and plainly shows Sanford Kwinters beliefs and ideology.
"Buckminster Fuller: Thinking Out Loud." Youtube. Zeitgeist Films, 1996. Web. 1 Oct. 2015.
Calatrava, Santiago, and Constantin Chariot. Santiago Calatrava: Sculptectures. Bruxelles: Fonds Mercator, 2010. Print.
Calatrava, Santiago, Cecilia Lewis Kausel, and Ann Pendleton-Julian. Santiago Calatrava, Conversations with Students: The M.I.T. Lectures. New York: Princeton Architectural, 2002. Print.
Eisenman, Peter. The Formal Basis of Modern Architecture.
N.p.: L Muler, 2006. Print.
The Formal Basis of Modern Architecture by Peter Eisenman looks primarily at the volume or form. The idea of space while alluded to after a fashion is given a back seat role to the envelope. It talks about how the volume is respondent to different internal and external forces that distort the shell. This was part of my inspiration for the deformed bubble. He seemed to believe that form could be derived from an objective approach to architecture.
Foster, Norman. "My Green Agenda for Architecture." Norman Foster:. TED Talks, n.d. Web. 30 Sept. 2015.
This was a speech given by Norman Foster in 2006 looking to the future of architecture and what the role of technology could be. He examined several of his buildings pointing out the major changes that were happening at the time with technology. H explained that in some cases he urged his clients to scale up their chasework in order to accommodate a yet unknown future. He also looked at how technology now allows us to mass produce building components of different shape. This is where he believes the future of architecture lies.
Frei Otto, Bodo Rasch: Finding Form: Towards an Architecture of the Minimal: Axel Menges, 1995. Print.
Fuller, R. Buckminster. Operating Manual for Spaceship Earth. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP, 1969. Print. This is a very difficult read. It to me seems somewhat like a rant by Buckminster Fuller about what he thinks is wrong with the world and how he would address it. There is a video on youtube that I have not seen yet that is a speech given by Fuller entitled "Thinking Out Loud" It is kind of what I think this writing is getting at but in more of what I would think of as a more understandable way. After watching the video I can now say it makes the writing somewhat easier to understand. In many words he lays out his ideas for light construction that is cheap and mobile and why he thinks it will be important in the future. What I get out of the writing is that Fuller was basically the first person thinking green. However he was not thinking green in the way we think of it today with CO2 emissions. He was thinking in terms of time and impact. I have no doubt that he also took emissions into account but it seems somewhat secondary. He was also somewhat of a humanitarian as he wanted to solve the worlds problems. Because of his background his solutions were all related to light transportable habitats that could be deployed and utilized very quickly. I believe the military also contracted Fuller as a result of these ideas. His most interesting point to me was that the form was only beautiful because it performed. in his mind any building that had a structure not directly related to its envelope was ugly and superfluous.
Glancey, Johnathan. "How Soap Bubbles and Cobwebs Helped Frei Otto Win Architecture's Greatest Prize." The Lightweight Champion of the World. The Gaurdian, 04 Oct. 2004. Web. 1 Oct. 2015.
This article was a throwback piece looking at the influence of Otto Frei on modern architecture. It traced his works back to their core describing the influence of soap bubbles and nature in his work. His work really was an exploration of how to span large spaces with the lightest possible materials. At the time of course steel concrete and glass were the primary materials being used. Frei's work dubbed membrane architecture was inspiration to the next few generations of designers including Buckminster Fuller and Norman Foster.
Frei Otto, Bodo Rasch: Finding Form: Towards an Architecture of the Minimal: Axel Menges, 1995. Print.
Fuller, R. Buckminster. Operating Manual for Spaceship Earth. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP, 1969. Print. This is a very difficult read. It to me seems somewhat like a rant by Buckminster Fuller about what he thinks is wrong with the world and how he would address it. There is a video on youtube that I have not seen yet that is a speech given by Fuller entitled "Thinking Out Loud" It is kind of what I think this writing is getting at but in more of what I would think of as a more understandable way. After watching the video I can now say it makes the writing somewhat easier to understand. In many words he lays out his ideas for light construction that is cheap and mobile and why he thinks it will be important in the future. What I get out of the writing is that Fuller was basically the first person thinking green. However he was not thinking green in the way we think of it today with CO2 emissions. He was thinking in terms of time and impact. I have no doubt that he also took emissions into account but it seems somewhat secondary. He was also somewhat of a humanitarian as he wanted to solve the worlds problems. Because of his background his solutions were all related to light transportable habitats that could be deployed and utilized very quickly. I believe the military also contracted Fuller as a result of these ideas. His most interesting point to me was that the form was only beautiful because it performed. in his mind any building that had a structure not directly related to its envelope was ugly and superfluous.
Grosz, Elizabeth. "Bodies-Cities." World Press
(n.d.): 241-53. Selforganizedseminar. World Press. Web. 9 Sept. 2015.
This article was part of my expanding on our first assignment. In this article Elizabeth Grosz was examining the relationship between the body and the city. It was not so much a "parks equal lungs" argument, but a look at how the two different systems, the organic body and the inorganic city form a kind of symbiosis. This lead me to one of my first questions of interest; what is the full extent of a buildings influence? In the same way Elizabeth Grosz was asking that question about the city but her focus was more at the larger scale looking inward and my idea was to look at a smaller scale outward.
Lee, Kwang Yuel. "Frei Otto, Bodo Rasch: Finding Form." Scribd. N.p., n.d. Web. 21 Oct. 2015.
This was a simple article in which Thom Mayne outlined his ideas on his role in the profession as a growth driver an somewhat got into his belief that technology and materials would should be the focus of the next generation of architects. This alluded to his personal beliefs for architecture. Also discussed in the article was his beginning as an intern and how he thought aspiring architects should approach the profession.
"Norman Foster: Striving for Simplicity." YouTube. TEDx, n.d. Web. 21 Oct. 2015.
"Norman Foster: Striving for Simplicity." YouTube. TEDx, n.d. Web. 21 Oct. 2015.
Turner, Judith, Smith-Miller, and Hawkinson Architects. Between Spaces. New York: Princton Architectural, 2000. Print.
This article has been very influential in my wok so far. In the article it hits on several points about the material but the most compelling points to we were the ones concerning the envelope. In the article the point was raised that today the envelope is becoming more and more fluid in responding to internal features and also external ones. To me the article seemed to attack the envelope that was influenced by external influences because it did not relate to the building itself. He also discusses bubble architecture and looks at the envelope as responding not so much to external conditions but as reacting to an internal special quality as an efficient system for the utilization of the space. This led me to wonder if there was a way to explore the situation where a exterior condition directly related to an internal one therefore having more importance with the form of the envelope. Could this situation exist? This was almost seeming in contradiction to Zaere- Polo's argument.






















